This woman is correct 100%. Everyone saying "masks work" in any way shape or form is 100% lost. What does "work" mean anyway?


Whether a mask stops an aersolized virus can ONLY be determined in a properly constructed peer reviewed scientific study, like the one done in Denmark, which 2 major journals still refuse to publish. Or in the absence of that, we have to rely on the dozen or so met meta analysis on the subject. And when we examine these, what are we looking for? We are looking for "statistical significance", not "work". If the results don't show "statistically significant" correlation, then anyone in power insisting there is, is a liar and a snake oil salesman, and should be hung by the neck until dead, for the damage they are doing.

That is the whole argument right there. There are no other options, choices, or possibilities.

Either masks / social distancing are effective (statistically significant), or they are not.

The REAL studies show conclusively, THAT THEY ARE NOT.

Full stop, end of story.

The only question left in my mind, is when do the Nuremburg trials II start?

Modal title