Skip (8)

I love that Gab exists, and dislike the censorship being promoted by this proposed law. However, I am also frustrated by the percentage of junk promoted on Gab. It is less valuable because of it.

A case in point, is where the Gab newsletter promoted a totally wrong understanding of what mRNA is, and thinks it can be used to modify DNA. Perhaps GabNews should make more effort to have its own fact-checkers double-check its own news. Especially on technical subjects. They can choose conservative fact-checkers, who are specialists they trust in the area they are commenting. And then, rather than blindly accept their recommendation, see if the fact-checkers can convince GabNews that GabNews had it wrong. And only then, publish what they feel is true.

Modal title